Evaluation in the 2009 general election indonesia: Victory democrat party and a list of voters remain problematic

version of the quick count was announced that the agency survey show democrat party winning the election vote in acquiring legislative institutions 2009.All survey states that the party winning 20% democratic vote party defeated Golkar and PDIP, previously a winner in the excitement 2004.Tetapi Election democrat party crucial problems that effect the level of credibility of the election in 2009, indonesia, where many residents are not listed in the voter list tetap.Beside that many people die or are declared under the age of entry in the list of voters remain.

Almost all regions in all indonesia that indikacate list of voters remain problematic.Kalau we Percentage based on reports from the media and among www.okezone.com ,www.liputan6.com cases that reach 20% to 30%. This makes the level of validity of election general in 2009 is all pihak. democrat party is certain to win or own worked list of voters who remain problematic indeed become a real winner of the election 2009.In this author tries to evaluate the results of 2009 general election voter list based on the cases remain problematic.Any 4 indication subject in evaluating the voter list remains problematic.
> swap


First, poor countries indonesia administration system that is not managed professionally causes the time bomb exploded at the time of election 2009.because management of the administration have still occurred in indonesia overlap between a region with other regions or between the central administration and residence region.Sistem managed by the department in the country level has not been structured so that sometimes the system does not match data between departments in the country with the fact that there is in society.

Second, the profesionalan election commission members in the management of the election administration 2009.hal can be seen by the disruption of the election system from the latest distribution of voice mail, voice mail changes to the most crucial is the list of voters remain problematics.Election comission more rekreatif tend to do the work than do make over list of voters who remain problematic.

Third, the voter list remains problematic is the scenario of the parties in this particular incumbent in the decline of the voice from the party competitor.This is a strategy to calculate the power weakened so that the opponent is able to decrease the sound Percentage earned victory parties others.Skenario this indication can be places on the basis of a certain mass is a prop and sound support certain parties.

Fourth, this case is a scenario from the anti-democratic parties to conduct the election turmoil, so that momentum is a momentum to damage the credibility of electoral democracy 2009. anti democracy willeasy to convince the mass movement for anti-democracy and can easily to turned offer public confidence about the validity of the election.

Then the question becomes the reader who deserves a case in the list of voters remain? Please help answer because the author is still confused.